Clive Palmer Rejected Mark McGowan’s Offer to End Defamation Case Early, Court Says

WA Prime Minister Mark McGowan tried to end the defamation lawsuit with Queensland businessman Clive Palmer in December last year, but Mr Palmer turned down his offer, the federal court has heard.

Shortly before Christmas, Mr McGowan made an offer to both sides to discontinue their proceedings and walk away, with each bearing their own costs, avoiding further charges.

But the offer was rejected by Mr. Palmer and the case moved on, with the court finding that both sides defamed each other in a damning verdict handed down last week.

Lawyers from both sides appeared in Federal Court this morning to discuss the charges, and Judge Michael Lee will make his decision later in the day.

Mr. McGowan was ordered last week to pay $5,000 in damages to Mr. Palmer, while Mr. Palmer was ordered to pay Mr. McGowan $20,000.

Highlighted daily attorney fees

During this morning’s arguments, Judge Lee noted that even the daily costs of Mr McGowan’s attorney Bret Walker SC exceeded the damages awarded.

“It’s an interesting state of your career that you reach when your daily compensation exceeds the award of damages,” he said.

WA’s hard line sparked the bitter feud between Mr. Palmer and Mr. McGowan.(Facebook: Clive Palmer, Mark McGowan)

Mr Walker’s response was met with laughter in court.

“I’d hate to think this is the first time this has happened,” he said.

Mr McGowan’s case has been funded by WA taxpayers, but the Prime Minister has gone to great lengths to point out that Mr Palmer initiated the defamation campaign.

Justice Lee said the rejected offer for both sides to run away would be important in his decision.

Waste of judicial resources

The smear campaign centered on their war of words about WA’s closed border and a Mr. Palmer mining project.

Judge Lee was scathing in his criticism of both men for wasting the court’s limited resources, telling the men, “The game hasn’t been worth the candle.”

Both chose to be part of the “hurried pot” of political life and should have expected the barbs that came with it, he said.

Space to play or pause, M to mute, left and right arrows to search, up and down arrows for volume.

Play video.  Duration: 2 minutes 9 seconds

Mark McGowan and Clive Palmer were criticized last week for the “lavish” defamation lawsuit.

The mining magnate was unhappy with the Prime Minister’s decision to close WA’s border in April 2020, which he said was disruptive to his business interests, and sought to reverse the closure in court.

During a series of press conferences in 2020, during the early days of the pandemic, Mr. McGowan called Mr. Palmer an “enemy of the state” for his actions.

The mining magnate told the court that this caused him to be brought into “hatred, ridicule and contempt,” but Judge Lee found the damage to his reputation nonexistent.

Mr Palmer, a serial litigator, was noted by the judge on the witness stand as “behaving with the unmistakable appearance of a man assured of the correctness of his own opinions”.

‘Foreigner waves his gun’

The other portion of the defamation claim related to a state agreement held by Mr. Palmer’s Mineralogy company for the Balmoral South iron ore project.

Leave a Comment